Mr. T
Thursday, November 29th, 2007I just got back from a symposia on legal activism at the Far Eastern University (FEU). UP Law Dean Raul Pangalangan, our professor in constitutional law 2 and the program’s guest speaker, in his capacity as the chair of KILOSBAYAN and Bantay Katarungan, interested us with alternative and modern methods in staging a real and lasting socio-political revolution.
Incidentally, and not without irony, Sen. Trillanes, along with a company of wayward soldiers acting on his capricious behest, just took the Manila Peninsula hotel hostage.
Reports of an ongoing coup d’etat in the midst of an engaging lecture on progressive action generated a din of laughter among the incredulous audience. I was not amused. To say that the recent pother of misguided principles, opportunists, smoke and guns in Makati is theory in practice, is to vindicate an atrocious act of indecency and immaturity by the bogus champion of people’s interest in the person of Mr. Trillanes.
I understand where this guy is coming from. Like him, I too have been consistently and vehemently passionate about certain ideals. Yet I can not, in all good conscience, place the lives of others, certainly not the country, in peril for the sake of expression.
No matter how strongly I should feel about anything, I do not rely on the strength of numbers to make my stand. If other people should decide to take my side and stand up for a shared sentiment, it should be guided by their very own personal convictions and not because I indoctrinated them with mine.
The problem of collective action is the question of concrete individuated preferences. Who’s to say that everybody involved in the coup attempt acted in their individual accord? Is their individual participation merely a product of esprit de corps gone awry? Do they even have an inkling of what they are getting themselves in? Or are they blindly obeying orders from their superior just as they were trained to.
Until their case is lodged and decided on by the Supreme Court, thereafter surface in the photocopied pages of SCRA (SC reports annotated) assigned as homework, I do not have the answers just yet.
For now I give them the benefit of the highest doubt in their favor. Might I suggest, although belatedly, that they attend Prof. Pangalangan’s lectures on revolution first before parading the streets with empty words and loaded guns. So then they would be perfectly intiated on the proper way to do it.
Am I inciting them to sedition and/or rebellion? Nah. If they succeed, as assuredly they will (what with the guidance of the brilliant wisdom of a UP Law professor), there’s no crime committed but simply a genuine revolution excuted in the grand manner.
My goodness. How did I ever pass the first semester?